Stop criminalising HIV!

Canadian and international organisations and individuals are invited to endorese the statement below. Thereb has been a marked increase in the frequency and severity of  criminal charges for the non-disclosure of a positive HIV status. Whilst these current cases are in Canada, it is a reflection of a much broader issue that poses serious threats to successful prevention programs as well as upon the ability to provide meaningful care and support for those people living with HIV.

For more information on the Canadian cases, visit http://www.aidslaw.ca/stopcriminalization . For a better understanding of the global situation, check out the blog of Edwin J Bernard.

On February 8, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear two landmark cases on the issue of criminalization of HIV non-disclosure in R v. Mabior and R v. DC. The Court’s decisions in these two appeal cases will have profound implications not only for people living with HIV, but also for Canadian public health, police practice and the criminal justice system.

 We invite Canadian and international organizations and professionals working on issues related to HIV/AIDS and in the fields of public health and law to endorse the following statement establishing that people living with HIV are not criminals in cases where the threshold of significant risk is not met, and calling for the criminal law to be based on the best available scientific evidence, not on assumptions, prejudice or fear.

IN ADVANCE OF LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASE, SUPPORTERS WORLDWIDE CALL ON CANADA TO STOP CRIMINALIZING PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV*

 Monday, February 6, 2012 – Canadian criminal law requires people living with HIV to disclose their status before engaging in behaviour that involves a “significant risk” of transmitting the virus. Yet people have been charged, and convicted for not disclosing their status, even though their activity did not pose a significant risk of HIV transmission. This is a miscarriage of justice. Further, it has contributed to a climate marked by anxiety, fear, stigma and misinformation that undermines HIV counselling, education and prevention efforts. This puts all Canadians at greater risk.

 On February 8, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear two landmark cases on this important issue. We, the undersigned, respectfully ask that the Court  use this opportunity to explicitly reconfirm that people living with HIV are not criminals in cases where the threshold of significant risk is not met – including cases where condoms are used or the HIV positive person was being successfully treated with antiretroviral drugs. We ask that the Court instruct lower courts that significant risk must be determined on the basis of the best available scientific evidence, not on assumptions, prejudice or fear.

 Finally, we call on the provincial and territorial Attorneys General to follow suit and adopt guidelines to limit prosecutions in cases of HIV non-disclosure. These prosecutions are not helpful in putting an end to this epidemic, and the radical over-extension of the criminal law is counter-productive and damaging.

Please send your signature as you would like it to appear – including your name, organization, title and geographic location – on the signatory list by Wednesday, Feb 1st at 5:00 p.m. EST to info@aidslaw.ca.  If your organization will sign on in full, please indicate that as well and include the French translation of your organization’s name if available.

Move over Andrew Bolt …

Generation Y-not

ynot

Although Emily Marks, Eliza Elkington, Alison Moore, Grace Cameron-Lee and Megan Gaudry, who we met in Manly last week, don’t engage in risky behaviour, they know people who have Picture: Tim Hunter Source: The Sunday Telegraph

THEY are the modern day invincibles. A generation of young women who blithely out-drink and out-smoke men, who routinely sunbake without protection and some engage in unsafe sex.

Health professionals are increasingly worried about the growing band of women who think they’re bulletproof.

The reckless behaviour is exposing some of them to sexually transmitted infections at record levels, with health officials saying Australia is in the middle of a chlamydia epidemic.

Adding to the concern is that some girls are having sex younger than ever. Research by Durex shows the average age teens have intercourse for the first time is 16 — two years younger than a decade ago.

An investigation by The Sunday Telegraph has revealed alarm about the health of young women and their attitude to sex, alcohol and even the sun.

“Young women aren’t taking responsibility for their health and safety,” Sexual Health Australia director Desiree Spierings said. “They have a relaxed attitude to unprotected sex as well.”

Many young women The Sunday Telegraph spoke to were open about the pressures they face from their social groups, egged on by edgy TV shows that feature sex, drugs and alcohol. Although the girls we spoke to at Manly last week didn’t engage in risky behaviour, they knew others who did.

“Sex is publicised as being really cool,” Eliza Elkington of Lapstone said, adding that Facebook has become a playground for full-on sex talk.

Emily Marks, 18, said: “The age girls are starting to have sex is much younger. In Year 7 there was no one doing it, but having just finished Year 12 we look at the younger students and they’re all doing it.”

Grace Cameron-Lee, 18, of Blaxland said: “It’s not that we think we’re bulletproof. It’s that we don’t always consider all the consequences.”

AIDS Action Council CEO Andrew Burry said: “We have a generation of kids in school with no real exposure to information about HIV, being taught by people, many of whom have also had no education or information about HIV.”

While we wait for the review of the Prostitution Act …

As we wait for the report from the committee undertaking a review of the ACT Prostitution Act, it is worth taking another look at this excellent report from 7.30 ACT, which aired towards the end of last year. The reporter was very sensitive and non-judgemental and presented a very balanced report in the end. The workers that were interviewed greatly appreciated the manner in which a difficult topic (from the community perspective) was handled.

http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/video/xnt0s7
7.30 ACT: Review of Prostitution ACT by andrewburry

Does HIV still matter to gay men?

The following article is reproduced from http://www.samesame.com.au/news/local/7828/Does-HIV-still-matter-to-gay-men.htm and go there to see the comments the story generated.

I see these periodic articles about how gay men are complacent, or young gay guys are ignorant of the risks. While you can’t be both complacent AND ignorant, either can certainly be true. For some years now I have been banging on about young gay men being in themselves a priority population. As the figures for NSW below demonstrate, young men in their 20′s are a substantial proportion of new infections. Despite the date showing this for the last 5 – 6 years, no priority was given to this group in the Sixth National Strategy and similarly, little regard (if any) in the new HIV Testing Policy.

I can’t help concluding that there is a correlation between these oversights and the fact that leadership throughout the HIV sector is made up of older people such as myself.

 

www.samesame.com.au

About the Author

www.samesame.com.au

Matt Akersten

Unlike during the 1990s, it might seem that no-one is dying of AIDS now. People living with the virus are looking healthier, and in New South Wales HIV infection rates have stabilised.

But the pool of people living with HIV is larger than ever, and infection rates have risen sharply in other areas of Australia and around the world in recent years.

This summer’s campaign by HIV/AIDS prevention and support network ACON hopes to address myths people might have about gay men’s health today, and give men having sex with men The Big Picture about the HIV epidemic.

The Big Picture website answers common questions and assumptions gay men might have about HIV, including ‘HIV isn’t that much of an issue these days’ and ‘When are HIV infections most likely to happen?’

Another question sometimes asked is: “Is it true that HIV only affects older gay men?”

As the graph below of 2010 HIV infections in NSW shows, the virus can affect anyone, regardless of their age – Many men were in their 30s and 40s when they are diagnosed with HIV; however, men in their 20s also make up a big part of HIV diagnoses each year.

ACON’s Director of Community Health Geoff Honnor hopes the Q&A’s in The Big Picture will stimulate discussion – and possibly more questions, which ACON are happy to answer.

“The epidemic is ever-evolving so it’s important to keep guys in the picture,” he says. “As a community, our level of HIV-related knowledge is pretty good, though as always, it varies between individuals and there’s still a few surprisingly common misconceptions kicking around.

“But overall, thirty years into it, the continuing resilience of gay guys – poz and neg – in this state in responding to HIV is pretty impressive. In fact, the comparative success attributed to the NSW HIV response owes a lot to that resilience and it could do with more acknowledgement.

“So, in offering information updates, The Big Picture also acknowledges the importance of the informed choices that gay men make about maximising pleasure and minimising risk – choices that ultimately deliver better outcomes for all of us.”

See The Big Picture website here.

Using condoms and water-based lube for anal sex, and getting regular sexual health checkups, is the best way to protect yourself against HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.

Ongoing debate on a proposed needle syringe program in Canberra’s jail

Radio Current Affairs Documentary: Needle exchange

Adrienne Francis reported this story on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 18:30:00

Listen to MP3 of this story ( minutes)

Alternate WMA version | MP3 download

ELIZABETH JACKSON: Out of sight and out of mind. The rights of convicted criminals are often glossed over. But in the nation’s capital, human rights legislation is designed to protect prisoners. The ACT Government is considering a plan to provide prisoners with clean drug injecting needles and syringes. If the pilot program goes ahead it would be a first in Australia. However, most prison officers are vehemently opposed and some are vowing to boycott any moves to trial prison needle and syringe programs.

Our reporter Adrienne Francis visited Canberra’s new prison to file this report.

PRISON GUARD: (To dog) Find it!…

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: For anyone attempting to smuggle narcotics, syringes, weapons, mobiles, alcohol or poisons into Canberra’s only prison, first you need to get past the sniffer dogs.

The two year old jail and remand centre can house up to 300 inmates.

CANINE UNIT CORRECTIONS OFFICER: Canine, about to conduct a passive alert search on intending visitors at the Alexander Maconochie Centre. The search entails a low and high search on a person using the canine’s olfactories.

(To dog) Hey mate, find it!

CANINE UNIT CORRECTIONS OFFICER 2: If the dog gives a positive response which is a sit response to the presence of a narcotic odour that person will then be taken to a room and we’ll have a conversation with that person and we’ll try and establish a) whether they are carrying some form of narcotic with an intent to try to introduce it into the centre, b) if it is residue odour if that person is under the influence of a drug and then we take the appropriate action.

(Sound of computerised voice on metal detector: “Access denied, please exit”)

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Screening for contraband doesn’t end there. There are x-ray body scanners and ion scanners to detect drug and chemical residues and before entry all staff and visitors are weighed and identified through an eye scanner. All baggage passes through a metal detector and x-ray.

Bernadette Mitcherson is the executive director of ACT Corrective Services.

BERNADETTE MITCHERSON: We know that approximately 80 per cent of people coming into custody were under the influence of alcohol or a drug at the time they committed the offence.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: For a few drug addicted inmates, custody can provide an opportunity to detox.

BERNADETTE MITCHERSON: There are another group who are not at a point where they want to stop using and have drug seeking behaviours which take a number of formats.

They might know they are coming into custody and try and bring something with them if they go to court and are expecting to have a sentence. They might put pressure on family and friends to bring things in and we know they do that because we can listen to telephone calls.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: There were a lot of hopes in some sections of the community that the new jail you could potentially keep drugs out. Can you?

BERNADETTE MITCHERSON: Every jurisdiction internationally and nationally struggles with this issue. Anyone who says that they’re totally drug free is looking at life and their business through rose-coloured glasses so I think it’s probably a near impossible task.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Some health policy advocates warn it would require draconian measures to curb illicit prison activities which would undermine rehabilitation of inmates.

Michael Moore is the chief executive officer of the Public Health Association of Australia. He’s also an adjunct professor at the University of Canberra and a former ACT health and corrections minister.

MICHAEL MOORE: The sorts of things that would need to be done to stop drugs going into prison is body cavity searching everybody going in and out of the prison.

So this would not be a great work environment for prison officers, starting your day with a body cavity search. But probably just as important, you know somebody is imprisoned for six months and that’s the average time, doesn’t want their wife or their mother coming in and being body cavity searched before they can come in for a visit.

(Sound of voices over the two-wave radio)

FORMER INMATE AND ILLICIT DRUG USER: I have spent two separate like times in there, and they were both for assaults. There was a lot of drug use, (inaudible) wasn’t very clean.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: This 26 year-old Canberra man has spent more than a year inside the Alexander Maconochie Centre. We can’t identify him for legal reasons. He’s also an illicit injecting drug user and has been unemployed for a long time.

FORMER INMATE AND ILLICIT DRUG USER: There’s like heroin, a lot of ice has been getting in, I know that, and bupe.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Bupe is short for buprenorphine. The prescription drug is similar to methadone and is administered to treat people addicted to heroin or other opioids such as morphine.

The former Canberra inmate says he’s seen other prisoners share needles. Among injecting drug users needles are sometimes referred to as weapons, equipment, works or fits, an abbreviation for outfit.

FORMER INMATE AND ILLICIT DRUG USER: From what I have seen from when I was in there, there was a fit that was used for about six months while I was there. It was just one needle and they’d just file it down. They’d use it through all the guys in the unit, very blunt. You could see it was blunt. Like, it kind of turned me off a little bit but I guess for somebody who has never done it before I can understand why they would want to go, like try it, and stuff and why they start in jail.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: The shared needles or fits are often cut down to the twenty or thirty unit markings on the side of a 100 millilitre syringe. Called short 20s or short 30s, they’re easier to smuggle into jail and conceal from prison officers.

FORMER INMATE AND ILLICIT DRUG USER: Yeah, sometimes in the mouth, sometimes in the body. Different places.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: He says he contracted hepatitis C before being convicted. And he’s not alone. The latest annual health survey of prisoners in Canberra found close to half of those voluntarily tested had been exposed to hepatitis C at some time during their life.

That’s more than 20 times the prevalence in the Canberra community. However, the survey did not screen for current infection. The virus is transmitted through blood and it affects the liver causing inflammation. If left untreated it can lead to cancer.

It’s not clear when or how these prisoners were exposed to the virus.

The Public Health Association of Australia’s chief executive officer Michael Moore.

MICHAEL MOORE: Certainly amongst the women it is very, very high. Different strains of hepatitis C are likely to be shared. And remember it’s not just one strain of hepatitis C, it is a series of strains. So even when somebody has hep C, if they are sharing needles the problem can be exacerbated by getting different strains.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: And there is evidence that a minority of Canberra prisoners have contracted hepatitis C while in custody. Voluntary blood screening has revealed two cases of hepatitis C contraction within the Canberra prison over the last year. And while none of the Canberra prisoners who volunteered for screening tested positive to HIV, health advocates are concerned about the multiple sharing of worn injecting equipment.

NICOLE WIGGINS: So if HIV gets into the prison and amongst injecting drug users it will spread very quickly and it has been shown in internationally HIV can, a couple of prisoners can have HIV and within a few months like a third of the prison population will have HIV.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Nicole Wiggins is the manager of the Canberra Alliance for Harm Minimisation and Advocacy.

NICOLE WIGGINS: We haven’t had an HIV outbreak in our prisons yet but it is pure luck, not good management and it is only a matter of time until there’s a HIV outbreak in our prisons.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Nicole Wiggins says inmates are not alone in their vulnerability to blood borne disease infection.

NICOLE WIGGINS: At the moment guards are at risk of accidental needle stick injury because the syringes in there at the moment are hidden in all sorts of places around the prison and guards get needle stick injuries.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Switzerland became the first country to provide its prisoners with clean drug injecting equipment in 1992. Since then eleven other countries including Germany, Spain, Luxembourg, Belarus, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan and Iran have introduced prison needle and syringe programs.

Ralf Jurgens reviewed the performance of these prison programs for the World Health Organisation. He’s the co-founder of the Canadian HIV Aids Legal Network.

RALF JURGENS: Studies consistently show a marked reduction of sharing of injection equipment and in none of these systems that have introduced needle exchange programs in prisons there have been new cases of HIV infection.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: The possibility of the first Australian prison needle and syringe program gained momentum in the ACT during the tenure of former chief minister Jon Stanhope. He oversaw construction of the Territory’s $130 million prison and remand complex, which opened in 2008.

For the 95 years prior to this all Canberra criminals were transported across the border to New South Wales jails. Unlike all other Australian jurisdictions the new Canberra prison operates under the ACT’s Human Rights Act.

JON STANHOPE: It recognises each of us have inalienable rights, such as the right to privacy and in the context of the operation of a prison, a right not to be subjected at a whim and without reasonable cause to a body search.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Jon Stanhope says the jail’s mandate is to rehabilitate and educate inmates rather than punish them.

JON STANHOPE: Prisoners are sent to prisons as punishment but the sending of them to the prison isn’t for punishment. It’s a very, very important distinction and the Human Rights Act essentially underscores that to ensure that in the regime that applies, the regime doesn’t impose this secondary punishment over and above the removal of their freedom.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Jon Stanhope drew his public policy inspiration from the philosophy first advocated by the centre’s controversial namesake Alexander Maconochie.

JON STANHOPE: Recognised universally as a great prison reformer and certainly the pre-eminent penal reformer in Australia’s history, a onetime commandant of Norfolk Island that turned traditional notions of corrections on their head.

Took the decision to treat prisoners as human beings, to have some regard for their rehabilitation, believed in their redemption or the possibility of redemption and transformed things such as recidivism rates, return to prison, was stunningly successful and then interestingly was recalled or sacked as a result of his progressive attitudes. That it was too progressive for the order of the day.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Jon Stanhope says he regrets not introducing a needle and syringe program from the start of the prison’s operations.

JON STANHOPE: Perhaps I was naive that we would establish a prison, that we would inculcate a human rights culture that the prison officers and all those that work within the prison would be with us, that they would willingly grasp the opportunity to work in a very different environment in a very different prison.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Instead he handed the baton to his successor, ACT Chief Minister Katy Gallagher. Prior to her elevation she commissioned the former ACT Health and Corrections Minister Michael Moore to investigate potential models for a needle and syringe program at the jail.

MICHAEL MOORE: People are entitled to the same level of health care and the same access to health within a prison as they are outside of the prison.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: The Moore Report recommended changing the ACT Correction’s Management Act to require the establishment of a prison needle and syringe program. It also recommended the creation of a contained program within the jail’s health centre that could be run by a non-government organisation or ACT Health.

MICHAEL MOORE: So a prisoner would say I need to go to the health centre as they do at the moment. That prisoner would be escorted by a prison officer, as happens at the moment. Once they reach the health centre the prisoner then says to the triage nurse, separate from the prison officers, actually what I need to do is inject.

They are taken to a room and looked after by the non-government organisation where they’re allowed to inject and then the equipment is left in the health centre and never goes out into the prison.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Michael Moore estimates a prison program could cost less than $100,000 a year. But the saving to taxpayers from preventing disease transmission and the related health care costs hasn’t been modelled. He also suggested simpler alternatives including exchange of dirty needles for clean injecting equipment or prison needle vending machines.

MICHAEL MOORE: It will be used as a political football. We are already within an election year. The elections in the ACT is in October of 2012. It is an issue that will not only have to be judged in terms of the health consequences which are really clear, the human rights consequences which are really clear but in terms of the political consequences.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: The ACT Chief Minister Katy Gallagher has repeatedly voiced her support for the proposed pilot but concedes she faces a battle with the union representing most of the prison officers.
KATY GALLAGHER: I could storm through and say here’s a needle and syringe program, it’s starting next year and then have a fair bit of unrest within that setting, within the workplace and not actually be able to deliver it anyway. But I haven’t given up hope that we’ll be able to come out with something innovative that actually deals with the blood borne virus issue.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: But the majority of Canberra prison officers are not convinced.

The Community and Public Sector Union represents more than 10,000 public prison officers nationally. The CPSU has a total membership of 160,000 people.

Nadine Flood is national secretary.

NADINE FLOOD: We have had officers who have been subject to needle stick injuries and indeed we have had an officer who has died from such an injury.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Ms Flood says the union is strongly opposed to the pilot program.

NADINE FLOOD: Well custodial officers not only in the ACT but in fact around the country have three critical concerns about such programs. That is workplace health and safety, the prospects for prisoner rehabilitation and the legality of custodial officers’ actions and whether they would be put at risk by being complicit in illegal activity.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: This Canberra prison officer won’t be named or allow his real voice to be heard. But he’s eager to share his concerns about complicity.

PRISON OFFICER: We have had 12 overdoses at the AMC since the AMC opened. It seems to me that we are introducing this as a harm reduction scheme but we are potentially creating more harm. I mean where does the department stand if somebody dies from an overdose in the injecting room with the needle that the department has provided?

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: The Canberra prison officer acknowledges no jail has been able to eliminate drugs but he says condoning drug use in custody threatens rehabilitation.

PRISON OFFICER: For them to get the drugs into prison is costing them 10 times the amount that it costs for the same drugs on the outside. The way they do that is they rack up huge debts with illegal gangs, then when they come out there is only one way they’re ever going to pay those debts back and that is going straight back to crime.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: And he says providing prisoners with clean needles would effectively introduce weapons into the prison.

PRISON OFFICER: To introduce the potential of blood filled syringes means that the prisoner is armed and the prison guards are not. If we are faced with blood filled syringes then we are faced with lifelong change.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Another unnamed Canberra prison officer agrees.

PRISON OFFICER 2: What’s happening would be a decrease in my security. There’s almost 100 per cent against the needle exchange and for the prisoners that I interact with on a daily basis we have almost total opposition to the needle exchange program because in their case they are locked inside, they are being stood over and the syringes can be used as a weapon, whether they are used or not, but as a psychological weapon.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Some former prisoners like this 26 year-old Canberra man disagree.

FORMER INMATE AND ILLICIT DRUG USER: There would be a limit to how many that they’d get and I don’t think the guys would want to use it, like waste it on the guards. You know, I think they would want to use them for what they were intended for.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: He says he’d support moves to provide clean injecting equipment to prisoners.

FORMER INMATE AND ILLICIT DRUG USER: I just think it would be a lot safer for the people in jail, even the guards, stop getting HIV and AIDS and hep C.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: But the prison officer says it’s not only illicit drug injecting needles that risk spreading blood borne viruses. This Canberra prison officer says illicit tattoo needles are more prevalent than drug injecting needles.

PRISON OFFICER: We would find four tattoo guns to one syringe.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: But isn’t the scarcity of the shared needles the concern? That because they are so scarce they are being shared with a bigger pool of people?

PRISON OFFICER: There is a scarcity of them there but like we have not been given the tools to stop the drugs getting in.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: The ACT Chief Minister Katy Gallagher says illicit prison tattoo needles are also on her agenda and she’s considering a regulated prison tattoo service. Nonetheless, prison officers have warned they’ll embark on sustained industrial action if the Government proceeds with the needle and syringe program.

PRISON OFFICER: We would be quite prepared to go on strike. I for one would be going on strike as soon as it came in.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: A threat which is being taken seriously by the ACT Chief Minister Katy Gallagher.

KATY GALLAGHER: Look I have no doubt that unless we work with them, introducing a program would be almost impossible.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Former ACT chief minister Jon Stanhope is also troubled by the strike ultimatum.

JON STANHOPE: I think the history here within in the ACT of the Alexander Maconochie has sent a very strong signal probably to the rest of Australia, don’t develop human rights, don’t respect the human rights of some of the most marginalised people within your society or your community, namely those of prisoners, because this is what you’ll cop.

I often dwell on this in darker moments in terms of progressive governments. There are not very many political leaders in Australia prepared to stand up and defend the rights of convicted criminals or prisoners. It just doesn’t happen.

So it will take, I think, a lot of courage. But I do believe the prison officers do have the capacity essentially to sabotage a good policy such as this and that would be a travesty.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: And in some overseas prisons industrial action has sabotaged needle and syringe programs.

In Spain Xavier Majo Roca has been involved in the development and implementation of these programs in more than twenty Catalan prisons in the north-east of the country.

He says they began attempting to introduce prison pilots in 1997 but the programs couldn’t begin until 2003.

XAVIER MAJO ROCA: There was a strong opposition from prison officers, especially from the trade unions of prison officers.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Dr Majo oversees harm reduction policies at the Catalan Ministry of Health’s substance abuse program. He says the programs have not led to increased prisoner drug use, needle stick injuries or violence.

(To Dr Majo) Does this kind of issue then require a particular political courage?

XAVIER MAJO ROCA: Yes it needs some political courage because on the one hand you have trade unions which can be very strong against this program while in fact there is no real fact supporting their fears or their misconceptions.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: Former ACT chief minister Jon Stanhope warns that political inaction could end up being more costly for governments. In the United Kingdom deaths in custody are investigated and governments can face charges of corporate manslaughter.

Jon Stanhope advocates all Australian jurisdictions should be held accountable for deaths in custody in a similar way. And that includes deaths in custody from infections transmitted due to the absence of clean injecting equipment.

Dr Xavier Majo Roca says a similar lawsuit prompted Spanish authorities to pilot prison needle and syringe programs.

XAVIER MAJO ROCA: One inmate got infected with HIV and they said that he got infected in our prison and he was not able to access clean needles. That went to the media, put pressure on our politicians to implement the needle and syringe exchange program in our prisons.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: The ACT Chief Minister Katy Gallagher says she’s still considering her options.

KATY GALLAGHER: Look and I think if you go back in history you’ll see that prison officers weren’t that supportive about condoms in jail when the AIDS epidemic was upon us. You know they’ve resisted change in correctional settings sometimes for good reasons.

They are an artificial environment, they’re closed settings, they’re not the same as the community, so I think we have to also listen to that but, you know, I think also in dealing with modern views about how we minimise harm, sometimes it requires a rethink.

ADRIENNE FRANCIS: As politicians come and go Australian prisoner and health advocacy groups have vowed to continue pushing their case for policy change. In the meantime this 26 year old former inmate is worried about his family members, partner and friends who are still in custody at Canberra’s jail.

FORMER INMATE AND ILLICIT DRUG USER: I just don’t want to see them get like hep C and go through what I’ve gone through. It is not a very pretty lifestyle.

ELIZABETH JACKSON: That report by Adrienne Francis. And you’ve been listening to a radio current affairs documentary.

 

Falling further behind …

Interesting that over the counter sales of self-administered HIV tests is close to becoming available in the United States following a trial involving 5,800 participants. Meanwhile, here in Australia, we are still farting about with rapid testing that we are going to restrict to clinical settings –  in the short term at least. In my view, such a restriction eliminates some clear advantages of this “new” (i.e. a decade old) technology. I think the real problem is going to be that as self-administered testing becomes increasingly normal across the Americas and Europe, we will find it hader and harder to justify why we haevn’t acted more quickly. As I’ve said before, we have missed the boat with rapid testing, and we need to address ourselves to an effective program of rolling out home testing … or at least making usable information available so that those inclined, can make informed and supported decisions.

New UpFront article for AAC newsletter

Our latest newsletter is looking at a variety of issues that are affecting our work. Specifically, the growing conservatism in some media we have traditionally used that is trying to censor, edit or influence our style of communication. This poses problems for us, whilst at the same time, I can’t help but feel we have become increasingly bland in recent years and lost some of our direct connection with the communities we serve.

Up Front January/February

Unusual Penile Discharge

Why do parents sometimes struggle to get their kids to see things the way they want them to? Why do teachers need special skills to manage students’ behaviour? In essence, it is the nature of the relationship, where one is in a position of authority and human nature has an innate need to challenge. These are parentchild relationships having an imbalance in power and control.

We approach our work with our priority populations with a commitment to peer education. This isn’t because of some wishy-washy idealistic community sector fluffiness. No, it is because peer to peer sets up adultadult relationships and notions of power, authority and control are more or less eliminated. This generates an essential credibility on both sides.

Our work involves health promotion. In simple terms this means giving people information that encourages a set of behavioural choices that reduce risk to an acceptable level should they choose. It doesn’t involve judging their decisions.

In reality, adverse outcomes through risk decisions should cause us to think our information was not relevant and provided no incentive to think and act differently. For us to be relevant, we have to be able to communicate in a way that connects and engages our target audience. We are not the Government and should present our authority only in terms of subject expertise. More importantly, we are peers and this must be inherent in our communication style and message. This means we are dependent on our image as an organisation and dependent on using the language and terminology embraced by those we are seeking to influence.

Keiran Rossteuscher has written a very thoughtful piece in this newsletter about the difficulties we are increasingly facing with conservative media that wants to edit our language for fear of offending those for whom the messages are not intended. So instead of talking about ‘pissing razor blades’ to highlight a possible indication of a gonorrhoea infection, we are asked to refer to ‘uncomfortable urination’. Instead of referring to a ‘drippy dick’ we are encouraged to use a term like the title of this piece.

The implication of this is that we have to be creative in our media choices and find different opportunities to maintain a sense and sound of being peers.

But, I also think this raises another question, which is whether we have lost some of our ability to communicate in a peer way. It remains relatively easy to do so in directly communicating in workshops, but how about when our messages are presented through a third party conduit such as a magazine or bus shelter? How are we perceived by our community after a decade or more of bland (at times) and authoritarian (at times) communication? It is often argued, correctly, that the success of gay men in minimising the epidemic of HIV in the early days was because it was gay men themselves who responded in a collective way. A definitive example of peer education.

These days, we in health promotion are bureaucratised within a sophisticated national and international sector, buried under tons of behavioural and epidemiological research and dependent as workers on government largesse to fund our professional lives. In other words, it has become more and more difficult for the communities most affected and/or at risk of HIV to control the message.

It took half a century to cut the road toll and not much less to reduce the rate of smoking, and all with authoritative and Government sponsored messages; frequently built around fear. In only a handful of years, gay men devised and executed programs that resulted in most men choosing condoms most of the time, decimating the rate of new infection by 1988 and most gay men still use condoms most of the time.

Given that early success, one would have supposed that HIV would have disappeared by now, but it hasn’t and $140 million of government sponsored research over the last decade hasn’t told us why. I think we need to wake up and stop TELLING gay men what to do. Let’s stop being bland and act like the peers we supposedly are.